Hook v British Airways Plc [2011] EWHC 379 (QB) (25 February 2011)

Hook v British Airways Plc [2011] EWHC 379 (QB) (25 February 2011)

Neither EC Regulation 1107/2006 nor Regulation 9 of the UK Regulations create a private law cause of action for damages against air carriers for discrimination; the Montreal Convention governs liability exclusively and precludes such claims. Remedies are limited to administrative enforcement, declarations, and injunctive relief.

Citation
[2011] EWHC 379
Parties
Claimant/appellant: Tony Hook; Defendant/respondent: British Airways PLC
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
25 February 2011
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Appeal From Decision Striking Out Damages Claim
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Montreal Convention Exclusivity, Compensation for Discrimination, Enforcement of EC Regulation 1107/2006, Administrative Remedies Vs Private Law Damages

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 22 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Tony Hook

Claimant/appellant

British Airways PLC

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Appeal From Decision Striking Out Damages Claim

  1. 1 Does Regulation 9 of the UK Regulations create an exception to the Montreal Convention exclusivity, allowing a private law damages claim for discrimination?
  2. 2 Does EC Regulation 1107/2006 override the Montreal Convention in respect of individual compensation claims for disabled persons?
  3. 3 Is there a breach of the principle of equivalence in denying a damages claim for discrimination in air travel?

Ratio Decidendi

Neither EC Regulation 1107/2006 nor Regulation 9 of the UK Regulations create a private law cause of action for damages against air carriers for discrimination; the Montreal Convention governs liability exclusively and precludes such claims. Remedies are limited to administrative enforcement, declarations, and injunctive relief.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • No damages claim allowed under Regulation 9 of the UK Regulations
  • Appellant may pursue administrative remedies, declarations, or injunctive relief