Redstone Mortgages Ltd v Wiemer & Anor
Posting the demand letter to the defendant's contact address constituted valid demand under the mortgage conditions, and there was no real prospect of defending the claim based on non-receipt or insurer payments; summary judgment was properly granted for the sum claimed.
- Parties
- Claimant: Redstone Mortgages Ltd; First Defendant: James Merlin Wiemer; Second Defendant: Debra Ann Jules
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 June 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Summary Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Mortgage Enforcement, Summary Judgment, Service of Demand, Estoppel, Calculation of Debt
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Redstone Mortgages Ltd
Claimant
James Merlin Wiemer
First Defendant
Debra Ann Jules
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Summary Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether valid demand for repayment was made under mortgage conditions
- 2 Whether payments by claimant's insurers should be credited to defendant's account
- 3 Whether estoppel arises from statements of account
Ratio Decidendi
Posting the demand letter to the defendant's contact address constituted valid demand under the mortgage conditions, and there was no real prospect of defending the claim based on non-receipt or insurer payments; summary judgment was properly granted for the sum claimed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Summary judgment for claimant in the sum of £287,697.78 upheld
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment