Dutton & Anor v Davis & Anor [2006] EWCA Civ 694 (04 May 2006)
The transaction, construed on its terms and in light of relevant surrounding circumstances, was an outright sale with options to repurchase and not a mortgage; the judge was correct to reject the recharacterisation as a mortgage.
- Citation
- [2006] EWCA Civ 694
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Andrew Dutton; Claimant/appellant: Mrs Dutton; Defendant/respondent: Mr Davis; Defendant/respondent: Mrs Davis
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 04 May 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Mortgages, Equitable Right of Redemption, Sale and Leaseback, Sham Transactions, Interpretation of Legal Instruments
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Andrew Dutton
Claimant/appellant
Mrs Dutton
Claimant/appellant
Mr Davis
Defendant/respondent
Mrs Davis
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the transaction was in substance a mortgage despite its form as a sale with options to repurchase
- 2 Whether the transaction was a sham
- 3 Whether the incidence of costs, stamp duty, and financial pressure rendered the transaction a mortgage
Ratio Decidendi
The transaction, construed on its terms and in light of relevant surrounding circumstances, was an outright sale with options to repurchase and not a mortgage; the judge was correct to reject the recharacterisation as a mortgage.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment