Bristol Alliance Ltd v Williams & Anor [2011] EWHC 1657 (QB) (01 July 2011)

Bristol Alliance Ltd v Williams & Anor [2011] EWHC 1657 (QB) (01 July 2011)

A motor insurer is liable under section 151 of the Road Traffic Act 1988 to satisfy a judgment for property damage caused by the insured's deliberate act, even if the policy excludes deliberate acts, because the statutory scheme and EU Directives require compulsory insurance to protect third parties, and policy exclusions cannot defeat this statutory right.

Citation
[2011] EWHC 1657
Parties
Claimant: Bristol Alliance Limited Partnership; First Defendant: James Williams; Second Defendant: EUI Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
01 July 2011
Procedural Posture
Civil (insurance/subrogation) / Preliminary Issue Determination in High Court (queen's Bench Division)
Outcome
Claimant entitled to recover from Second Defendant under section 151 RTA 1988, even if damage was caused deliberately and policy excludes deliberate acts.
Legal Topics
Motor Insurance, Third Party Liability, Subrogation, Deliberate Acts Exclusion, Direct Action Against Insurer, Interpretation of Road Traffic Act 1988, Implementation of EU Motor Insurance Directives
Insurance Law Tort Law Statutory Interpretation European Union Law Motor Insurance Third Party Liability Subrogation Deliberate Acts Exclusion +3 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Bristol Alliance Limited Partnership

Claimant

James Williams

First Defendant

EUI Limited

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil (insurance/subrogation) / Preliminary Issue Determination in High Court (queen's Bench Division)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a motor insurer is liable under section 151 of the Road Traffic Act 1988 to satisfy a judgment for property damage caused by the insured's deliberate act, where the policy excludes deliberate acts and the claim is brought by subrogated property insurers.

Ratio Decidendi

A motor insurer is liable under section 151 of the Road Traffic Act 1988 to satisfy a judgment for property damage caused by the insured's deliberate act, even if the policy excludes deliberate acts, because the statutory scheme and EU Directives require compulsory insurance to protect third parties, and policy exclusions cannot defeat this statutory right.

Court Disposition

Claimant entitled to recover from Second Defendant under section 151 RTA 1988, even if damage was caused deliberately and policy excludes deliberate acts.

Orders

  • Preliminary issue answered in the affirmative: Claimant may recover from Second Defendant under section 151 RTA 1988.