Wigley-Foster v Wilson & Anor [2016] EWCA Civ 454 (16 May 2016)
The right to claim against the MIB under regulations 11 and 12 of the 2003 Regulations accrues when the insurer or its claims representative fails to provide a reasoned reply within three months of the claim, and this right is not extinguished by the subsequent insolvency or loss of authorisation of the insurer.
- Citation
- [2016] EWCA Civ 454
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Jade Wigley-Foster; 1st Defendant: Natasha Wilson; 2nd Defendant/respondent: The Motor Insurers Bureau (MIB)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 May 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Preliminary Issue
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Motor Insurance Directives, Compensation Body Liability, Insolvency of Insurer, Cross Border Road Traffic Accidents
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jade Wigley-Foster
Claimant/appellant
Natasha Wilson
1st Defendant
The Motor Insurers Bureau (MIB)
2nd Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Preliminary Issue
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the MIB is liable to compensate the claimant under regulations 11 and 12 of the Motor Vehicles (Compulsory Insurance) (Information Centre and Compensation Body) Regulations 2003 following the failure by the insurer or its UK claims representative to provide a reasoned reply in time, in circumstances where the insurer subsequently became insolvent or was already insolvent at the time of claim presentation.
Ratio Decidendi
The right to claim against the MIB under regulations 11 and 12 of the 2003 Regulations accrues when the insurer or its claims representative fails to provide a reasoned reply within three months of the claim, and this right is not extinguished by the subsequent insolvency or loss of authorisation of the insurer.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- The revised preliminary issue is answered affirmatively in respect of both paragraphs (a) and (b): the MIB is liable to compensate the claimant under regulations 11 and 12 in the circumstances described.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment