Miller v Hales & Ors [2006] EWHC 1529 (QB) (06 July 2006)
Section 145(4)(a) of the Road Traffic Act 1988 does not exclude police constables from compulsory insurance cover as they are not employees, and there is no cogent reason to interpret 'employment' as including 'quasi-employment' for police officers. Therefore, the insurer is liable under section 151 to satisfy the judgment against the first defendant.
- Citation
- [2006] EWHC 1529 (QB)
- Parties
- Claimant: Guy Miller; First Defendant: Ricky Hales; Second Defendant: QBE International Insurance Ltd trading as Ensign Motor Policies at Lloyds; Third Defendant: The Motor Insurers Bureau
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 06 July 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Declaration granted in favour of the claimant.
- Legal Topics
- Motor Insurance Liability, Police Officer Status Under Employment Law, Interpretation of Road Traffic Act 1988, Third Party Insurance Coverage, Employer's Liability Exclusion
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Guy Miller
Claimant
Ricky Hales
First Defendant
QBE International Insurance Ltd trading as Ensign Motor Policies at Lloyds
Second Defendant
The Motor Insurers Bureau
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a police constable is excluded from insurance cover under section 145(4)(a) of the Road Traffic Act 1988 as an employee or quasi-employee
- 2 Whether section 145(4A) of the Road Traffic Act 1988 applies to the claimant's circumstances
Ratio Decidendi
Section 145(4)(a) of the Road Traffic Act 1988 does not exclude police constables from compulsory insurance cover as they are not employees, and there is no cogent reason to interpret 'employment' as including 'quasi-employment' for police officers. Therefore, the insurer is liable under section 151 to satisfy the judgment against the first defendant.
Court Disposition
Declaration granted in favour of the claimant.
Orders
- Second defendant insurers are obliged to pay whatever the first defendant, Ricky Hales, is bound to pay under the judgment entered against him.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment