Dune Group Ltd & Ors v Visa Europe Ltd & Ors [2022] EWCA Civ 1278 (04 October 2022)
The Court held that, following the introduction of the Interchange Fee Regulation, it is at least seriously arguable that the appropriate counterfactuals for assessing restriction of competition are those proposed by Visa and Mastercard (UIFM and bilaterals counterfactuals), and not necessarily no default MIF with settlement at par. The CAT was correct to refuse summary judgment for the claimants on UK, Irish and intra-EEA consumer MIFs post-9 December 2015, as Visa and Mastercard have real prospects of success on these points. The CAT was also correct to refuse summary judgment on inter-regional consumer MIFs, as the effect on competition is not self-evident and requires examination at...
- Citation
- [2022] EWCA Civ 1278
- Parties
- Claimants/appellants: Dune Group Limited and others; Defendant/respondent: Visa Europe Limited; Defendant/respondent: Visa Europe Services LLC; Defendant/respondent: Visa UK Limited; Defendant/respondent: Mastercard Incorporated; Defendant/respondent: Mastercard International Incorporated; Defendant/respondent: Mastercard Europe SA; Defendant/respondent: Mastercard/Europay UK Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 04 October 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Competition Appeal Tribunal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; CAT's refusal of summary judgment upheld.
- Legal Topics
- Multilateral Interchange Fees, Article 101 TFEU, Competition Act 1998, Interchange Fee Regulation, Summary Judgment, Restriction of Competition, Counterfactual Analysis
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dune Group Limited and others
Claimants/appellants
Visa Europe Limited
Defendant/respondent
Visa Europe Services LLC
Defendant/respondent
Visa UK Limited
Defendant/respondent
Mastercard Incorporated
Defendant/respondent
Mastercard International Incorporated
Defendant/respondent
Mastercard Europe SA
Defendant/respondent
Mastercard/Europay UK Limited
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Competition Appeal Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether post-9 December 2015 UK, Irish and intra-EEA consumer MIFs infringe Article 101(1) TFEU in light of the Interchange Fee Regulation
- 2 Whether inter-regional consumer MIFs infringe Article 101(1) TFEU
- 3 Whether the acquisition of Visa Europe by Visa Inc or Visa Inc's role with inter-regional MIFs provides a defence
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that, following the introduction of the Interchange Fee Regulation, it is at least seriously arguable that the appropriate counterfactuals for assessing restriction of competition are those proposed by Visa and Mastercard (UIFM and bilaterals counterfactuals), and not necessarily no default MIF with settlement at par. The CAT was correct to refuse summary judgment for the claimants on UK, Irish and intra-EEA consumer MIFs post-9 December 2015, as Visa and Mastercard have real prospects of success on these points. The CAT was also correct to refuse summary judgment on inter-regional consumer MIFs, as the effect on competition is not self-evident and requires examination at...
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; CAT's refusal of summary judgment upheld.
Orders
- Summary judgment refused for claimants on UK, Irish and intra-EEA consumer MIFs post-9 December 2015.
- Summary judgment refused for claimants on inter-regional consumer MIFs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment