Gibson, R. v Rev 1 [2006] EWCA Crim 1 (11 January 2006)
The trial judge exercised proper discretion in admitting accomplice evidence, gave adequate warnings, and correctly refused applications to discharge the jury or rule no case to answer. The appellant's new evidence lacked credibility and reasonable explanation for its absence at trial; thus, leave to appeal was refused.
- Citation
- [2006] EWCA Crim 1
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina; Appellant/defendant: Leslie Gordon Gibson
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 January 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Admissibility of Accomplice Evidence, Fresh Evidence on Appeal, Joint Trial Prejudice, No Case to Answer
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecution
Leslie Gordon Gibson
Appellant/defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the conviction was unsafe due to reliance on accomplice evidence
- 2 Whether there was a case to answer based on the evidence
- 3 Whether the trial was prejudiced by false defence witnesses
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge exercised proper discretion in admitting accomplice evidence, gave adequate warnings, and correctly refused applications to discharge the jury or rule no case to answer. The appellant's new evidence lacked credibility and reasonable explanation for its absence at trial; thus, leave to appeal was refused.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment