Cooper, R. v [2022] EWCA Crim 166 (04 February 2022)

Cooper, R. v [2022] EWCA Crim 166 (04 February 2022)

The trial judge's directions on circumstantial evidence were fair, balanced, and in accordance with established legal principles; there was no error or unfairness. The sentencing approach, including the uplift for the firearms offence, was appropriate, did not involve double-counting, and reflected the totality of the applicant's criminality.

Citation
[2022] EWCA Crim 166
Parties
Prosecution: Regina; Applicant/defendant: Garry Cooper
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
04 February 2022
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Outcome
Applications for leave to appeal against conviction and sentence refused.
Legal Topics
Murder, Conspiracy to Supply Class a Drugs, Affray, Possession of Firearm With Intent, Sentencing, Jury Directions, Circumstantial Evidence
Criminal Law Murder Conspiracy to Supply Class a Drugs Affray Possession of Firearm With Intent Sentencing Jury Directions Circumstantial Evidence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Prosecution

Garry Cooper

Applicant/defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge's direction to the jury on circumstantial evidence was inadequate or unfair
  2. 2 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive or involved double-counting

Ratio Decidendi

The trial judge's directions on circumstantial evidence were fair, balanced, and in accordance with established legal principles; there was no error or unfairness. The sentencing approach, including the uplift for the firearms offence, was appropriate, did not involve double-counting, and reflected the totality of the applicant's criminality.

Court Disposition

Applications for leave to appeal against conviction and sentence refused.