St Clair v King & Anor [2022] EWHC 40 (Ch) (12 January 2022 )
The court found insufficient evidence of mutual wills or a binding contract. There was no proof of fraudulent calumny or undue influence. Medical and factual evidence established Mrs Lech had testamentary capacity and knew and approved the 2009 will. The 2009 will was valid and should be admitted to probate.
- Citation
- [2022] EWHC 40 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Anna Myfanwy St Clair; First Defendant: Nicholas Hilton King; Second Defendant: June Marion Farrell
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Procedural Posture
- Probate/will Challenge / Final Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed; 2009 will admitted to probate.
- Legal Topics
- Mutual Wills, Testamentary Capacity, Fraudulent Calumny, Undue Influence, Knowledge and Approval, Contract to Make a Will
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Anna Myfanwy St Clair
Claimant
Nicholas Hilton King
First Defendant
June Marion Farrell
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Probate/will Challenge / Final Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Were the 2007 wills mutual wills creating a binding constructive trust?
- 2 Was there a contract obliging Mrs Lech not to revoke the 2007 will?
- 3 Was the 2009 will procured by fraudulent calumny or undue influence?
Ratio Decidendi
The court found insufficient evidence of mutual wills or a binding contract. There was no proof of fraudulent calumny or undue influence. Medical and factual evidence established Mrs Lech had testamentary capacity and knew and approved the 2009 will. The 2009 will was valid and should be admitted to probate.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed; 2009 will admitted to probate.
Orders
- 2009 will of Jean Eileen Lech admitted to probate.
- Claim of Anna Myfanwy St Clair dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment