Bashar v Thompson & Anor [2022] EWHC 25 (QB) (11 January 2022)
The statements that Mr Bashar has 'extreme views' and 'extreme values and views' are Chase level 1 statements and are defamatory at common law, as they impute conduct tending to lower him in the estimation of right-thinking people, crossing the common law threshold of seriousness.
- Citation
- [2022] EWHC 25 (QB)
- Parties
- Claimant: Minhaz Bashar; First Defendant: Danielle Thompson; Second Defendant: Birmingham City Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 January 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Defamation / Trial of Preliminary Issues (meaning and Whether Defamatory at Common Law)
- Outcome
- Statements found to be defamatory at common law; preliminary issues determined.
- Legal Topics
- Natural and Ordinary Meaning, Defamatory Statements, Chase Levels, Common Law Threshold, Contextual Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Minhaz Bashar
Claimant
Danielle Thompson
First Defendant
Birmingham City Council
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Defamation / Trial of Preliminary Issues (meaning and Whether Defamatory at Common Law)
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the natural and ordinary meaning of the alleged defamatory statements?
- 2 Are the statements defamatory at common law?
Ratio Decidendi
The statements that Mr Bashar has 'extreme views' and 'extreme values and views' are Chase level 1 statements and are defamatory at common law, as they impute conduct tending to lower him in the estimation of right-thinking people, crossing the common law threshold of seriousness.
Court Disposition
Statements found to be defamatory at common law; preliminary issues determined.
Orders
- Matter referred back to Master Cook for directions on limitation issue.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment