Watson & British Boxing Board Of Control Ltd & Anor [2000] EWCA Civ 2116 (19 December 2000)
The Board, by assuming control over the safety arrangements for professional boxing and requiring compliance with its rules, assumed responsibility for the medical safety of boxers. Boxers, including Watson, relied on the Board to provide adequate medical safeguards. This created a relationship of proximity and reliance sufficient to impose a duty of care. The Board's failure to ensure immediate and effective medical treatment at ringside constituted a breach of that duty, and the breach caused Watson's injuries.
- Citation
- [2000] EWCA Civ 2116
- Parties
- Respondent/claimant: Michael Alexander Watson; Appellant/defendant: British Boxing Board of Control Limited; Appellant/defendant: World Boxing Organisation Incorporated
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 December 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (civil) / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; judgment for claimant upheld
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Duty of Care, Assumption of Responsibility, Personal Injury, Regulatory Liability
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael Alexander Watson
Respondent/claimant
British Boxing Board of Control Limited
Appellant/defendant
World Boxing Organisation Incorporated
Appellant/defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal (civil) / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the British Boxing Board of Control owed a duty of care to a professional boxer injured during a sanctioned fight
- 2 Whether the Board breached any such duty
- 3 Whether any breach caused the claimant's injuries
Ratio Decidendi
The Board, by assuming control over the safety arrangements for professional boxing and requiring compliance with its rules, assumed responsibility for the medical safety of boxers. Boxers, including Watson, relied on the Board to provide adequate medical safeguards. This created a relationship of proximity and reliance sufficient to impose a duty of care. The Board's failure to ensure immediate and effective medical treatment at ringside constituted a breach of that duty, and the breach caused Watson's injuries.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; judgment for claimant upheld
Orders
- The Board is liable in negligence to Michael Watson for the injuries sustained.
- Damages to be assessed or as previously determined.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment