Barry v Wynn [2001] EWCA Civ 710 (11 May 2001)

Barry v Wynn [2001] EWCA Civ 710 (11 May 2001)

The risk of the boys running out in front of the bus was not a reasonably apparent possibility that required the appellant to sound his horn. The recorder imposed too high a burden on the driver; the appellant's conduct did not amount to negligence in the circumstances.

Citation
[2001] EWCA Civ 710
Parties
Claimant/respondent: Robert Richard Barry; Defendant/appellant: John Stanley Wynn
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 May 2001
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court Judgment on Liability in Road Traffic Accident
Outcome
Appeal allowed; judgment for defendant
Legal Topics
Negligence, Contributory Negligence, Duty of Care, Road Traffic Accidents

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Robert Richard Barry

Claimant/respondent

John Stanley Wynn

Defendant/appellant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court Judgment on Liability in Road Traffic Accident

  1. 1 Whether the appellant lorry driver was negligent in failing to sound his horn when overtaking a stationary bus from which children had alighted
  2. 2 Whether the risk of children running in front of the bus was a reasonably apparent possibility imposing a duty to take precautions

Ratio Decidendi

The risk of the boys running out in front of the bus was not a reasonably apparent possibility that required the appellant to sound his horn. The recorder imposed too high a burden on the driver; the appellant's conduct did not amount to negligence in the circumstances.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; judgment for defendant

Orders

  • Recorder's finding on liability set aside
  • Judgment entered for the appellant/defendant