Young v Ministry of Defence [2003] EWCA Civ 817 (02 May 2003)

Young v Ministry of Defence [2003] EWCA Civ 817 (02 May 2003)

The claimant failed to prove on the balance of probabilities that the mechanical defects in the AFV caused or materially contributed to the accident. The evidence supported the judge's finding that driver error was the more likely cause.

Citation
[2003] EWCA Civ 817
Parties
Claimant/appellant: John Paul Young; Defendant/respondent: The Ministry of Defence
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
02 May 2003
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Negligence, Causation, Standard of Proof, Mechanical Defect Liability
Tort Personal Injury Military Law Negligence Causation Standard of Proof Mechanical Defect Liability

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

John Paul Young

Claimant/appellant

The Ministry of Defence

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether mechanical defects in the AFV caused or contributed to the accident resulting in injury and death
  2. 2 Whether the trial judge erred in finding driver error as the cause of the accident

Ratio Decidendi

The claimant failed to prove on the balance of probabilities that the mechanical defects in the AFV caused or materially contributed to the accident. The evidence supported the judge's finding that driver error was the more likely cause.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • No order for costs