Donaldson v Wilson [2004] EWCA Civ 123 (26 January 2004)
On the facts, it was foreseeable that the gate might be left open and cattle could stray onto the road, and the cost of preventative measures was small; therefore, the defendant was in breach of his duty of care to the claimant.
- Citation
- [2004] EWCA Civ 123
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Peter Donaldson; Defendant/appellant: Alec Norris Wilson
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 26 January 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal granted on condition that the defendant indemnifies the claimant for costs in the Court of Appeal; no order for costs at this stage.
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Duty of Care, Liability for Animals, Standard of Care
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Peter Donaldson
Claimant/respondent
Alec Norris Wilson
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant farmer breached his duty of care by failing to secure a gate, resulting in cattle straying onto a public road and causing injury to the claimant.
Ratio Decidendi
On the facts, it was foreseeable that the gate might be left open and cattle could stray onto the road, and the cost of preventative measures was small; therefore, the defendant was in breach of his duty of care to the claimant.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal granted on condition that the defendant indemnifies the claimant for costs in the Court of Appeal; no order for costs at this stage.
Orders
- Permission to appeal granted subject to conditions regarding costs.
- Defendant to indemnify claimant for costs in the Court of Appeal in any event.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment