Blake v Galloway [2004] EWCA Civ 814 (24 June 2004)

Blake v Galloway [2004] EWCA Civ 814 (24 June 2004)

In informal horseplay, participants impliedly consent to the risk of injury from actions done in accordance with the tacit conventions of the activity. Liability in negligence or battery only arises where conduct amounts to recklessness or a very high degree of carelessness. The defendant's conduct did not meet this threshold; the injury was an unfortunate accident, not actionable in tort.

Citation
[2004] EWCA Civ 814
Parties
Claimant/respondent: Blake; Appellant/defendant: Galloway
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
24 June 2004
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court to Court of Appeal
Outcome
Appeal allowed; claim dismissed.
Legal Topics
Negligence, Battery, Consent, Volenti Non Fit Injuria, Contributory Negligence, Personal Injury

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Blake

Claimant/respondent

Galloway

Appellant/defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court to Court of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the defendant was liable in negligence or battery for injuries caused during informal horseplay
  2. 2 Whether the claimant consented to the risk of injury (volenti non fit injuria)
  3. 3 What standard of care applies to informal games or horseplay

Ratio Decidendi

In informal horseplay, participants impliedly consent to the risk of injury from actions done in accordance with the tacit conventions of the activity. Liability in negligence or battery only arises where conduct amounts to recklessness or a very high degree of carelessness. The defendant's conduct did not meet this threshold; the injury was an unfortunate accident, not actionable in tort.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; claim dismissed.

Orders

  • Appeal allowed with costs below and half costs in Court of Appeal, subject to detailed assessment if not agreed.