Bland & Anor v Morris & Anor [2006] EWCA Civ 56 (18 January 2006)
The judge was entitled to find Mrs Morris two-thirds to blame and Mr Bland one-third to blame for the accident, given Mrs Morris's direct responsibility for her passengers and her failure to take available steps to ensure their safety after stopping in a dangerous position, and there was no error in the judge's apportionment of liability.
- Citation
- [2006] EWCA Civ 56
- Parties
- Respondent/claimant: Simon Paul Bland; Respondent/claimant: Rathbones Bakeries Ltd; Appellant/defendant: Jeanette Priscilla Morris; Appellant/defendant: Ministry of Defence
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 January 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (queen's Bench Division) to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Apportionment of Liability, Duty of Care, Road Traffic Accidents, Contributory Negligence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Simon Paul Bland
Respondent/claimant
Rathbones Bakeries Ltd
Respondent/claimant
Jeanette Priscilla Morris
Appellant/defendant
Ministry of Defence
Appellant/defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (queen's Bench Division) to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the apportionment of liability for a road traffic accident between Mrs Morris and Mr Bland was correct
- 2 Whether Mrs Morris owed a greater duty of care to her passengers than Mr Bland
- 3 Whether the judge erred in attributing two-thirds of the blame to Mrs Morris
Ratio Decidendi
The judge was entitled to find Mrs Morris two-thirds to blame and Mr Bland one-third to blame for the accident, given Mrs Morris's direct responsibility for her passengers and her failure to take available steps to ensure their safety after stopping in a dangerous position, and there was no error in the judge's apportionment of liability.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Parties to use best endeavours to agree costs; any disagreement to be submitted on paper to Lord Justice Buxton for summary assessment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment