Davies v Cullip [2008] EWCA Civ 1620 (10 December 2008)
The Recorder's findings of fact established that Mr Cullip was negligent in emerging onto the main road without ensuring it was safe, causing the collision and injury. Mr Davies' actions, even if involving a slight deviation into the hatched area, were not causative and did not amount to contributory negligence. The only proper conclusion was that Mr Cullip was wholly to blame.
- Citation
- [2008] EWCA Civ 1620
- Parties
- Respondent/claimant: Owen Davies; Appellant/defendant: Daren Cullip
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 December 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury Appeal / Appeal From County Court Judgment on Liability
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Contributory Negligence, Highway Code, Liability in Road Traffic Accidents
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Owen Davies
Respondent/claimant
Daren Cullip
Appellant/defendant
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury Appeal / Appeal From County Court Judgment on Liability
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mr Cullip was negligent in emerging onto the main road
- 2 Whether Mr Davies was contributorily negligent by entering the hatched area in breach of Rule 109 of the Highway Code
Ratio Decidendi
The Recorder's findings of fact established that Mr Cullip was negligent in emerging onto the main road without ensuring it was safe, causing the collision and injury. Mr Davies' actions, even if involving a slight deviation into the hatched area, were not causative and did not amount to contributory negligence. The only proper conclusion was that Mr Cullip was wholly to blame.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed; liability remains wholly with Mr Cullip
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment