Goad v Butcher & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 158 (22 February 2011)
The defendant was not negligent in making the turn with 110 metres visibility on a clear day; the accident was solely caused by the claimant's excessive speed, and the judge was entitled to dismiss the claim.
- Citation
- [2011] EWCA Civ 158
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Nicholas Owen Goad; First Defendant/respondent: Peter Butcher; Second Defendant/respondent: W. I. Butcher & Sons
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 February 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury Appeal / Appeal From High Court (queen's Bench Division) to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Contributory Negligence, Highway Code, Duty of Care, Causation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nicholas Owen Goad
Claimant/appellant
Peter Butcher
First Defendant/respondent
W. I. Butcher & Sons
Second Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury Appeal / Appeal From High Court (queen's Bench Division) to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant was negligent in making a right turn across the claimant's path
- 2 Whether breach of the Highway Code constituted negligence
- 3 Whether the claimant's excessive speed was the sole cause of the accident
Ratio Decidendi
The defendant was not negligent in making the turn with 110 metres visibility on a clear day; the accident was solely caused by the claimant's excessive speed, and the judge was entitled to dismiss the claim.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment