Steadman v London United Busways Ltd & Anor [2011] EWHC 2136 (QB) (05 August 2011)
The court found that the second defendant, Matthew Sala, did not brake suddenly or negligently and that his driving was considerate and appropriate in the circumstances. The evidence of the bus driver, Mr Atkinson, was found to be unreliable and self-serving. The court concluded that the accident was not caused by any negligence on the part of the second defendant. Accordingly, the first defendant, London United Busways Limited, remained liable for the claimant's injuries pursuant to its undertaking.
- Citation
- [2011] EWHC 2136
- Parties
- Claimant: Valerie Steadman; First Defendant: London United Busways Limited; Second Defendant: Matthew Sala
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 August 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury / Trial of Preliminary Issue of Liability Between Defendants
- Outcome
- Second defendant not liable; first defendant remains liable for claimant's injuries.
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Road Traffic Accident, Vicarious Liability, Evidence Assessment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Valerie Steadman
Claimant
London United Busways Limited
First Defendant
Matthew Sala
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury / Trial of Preliminary Issue of Liability Between Defendants
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the second defendant, Matthew Sala, was negligent and caused the accident resulting in the claimant's injuries
- 2 Whether the first defendant, London United Busways Limited, was liable for the accident
- 3 Assessment of credibility of witnesses and reliability of evidence
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the second defendant, Matthew Sala, did not brake suddenly or negligently and that his driving was considerate and appropriate in the circumstances. The evidence of the bus driver, Mr Atkinson, was found to be unreliable and self-serving. The court concluded that the accident was not caused by any negligence on the part of the second defendant. Accordingly, the first defendant, London United Busways Limited, remained liable for the claimant's injuries pursuant to its undertaking.
Court Disposition
Second defendant not liable; first defendant remains liable for claimant's injuries.
Orders
- Claim against second defendant dismissed.
- First defendant to meet claimant's claim in full as previously undertaken.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment