Kashi (t/a Tantalizing Face and Body Clinic) v Mustafa [2011] EWHC 2701 (QB) (21 October 2011)
The trial judge correctly applied the burden and standard of proof, made findings of fact supported by evidence, properly exercised discretion in procedural matters, and there was no basis for admitting fresh evidence or interfering with the judgment.
- Citation
- [2011] EWHC 2701
- Parties
- Appellant/defendant: Dhiaa Kashi (t/a Tantalizing Face and Body Clinic); Respondent/claimant: Miss Shahinaz Mustafa
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 October 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal (personal Injury Negligence) / Appeal From County Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Standard of Proof, Procedural Irregularity, Admissibility of Fresh Evidence, Credibility of Witnesses
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dhiaa Kashi (t/a Tantalizing Face and Body Clinic)
Appellant/defendant
Miss Shahinaz Mustafa
Respondent/claimant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (personal Injury Negligence) / Appeal From County Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge erred in law regarding the burden and standard of proof
- 2 Whether the trial judge erred in fact regarding the date of the incident
- 3 Whether fresh evidence should be admitted on appeal
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge correctly applied the burden and standard of proof, made findings of fact supported by evidence, properly exercised discretion in procedural matters, and there was no basis for admitting fresh evidence or interfering with the judgment.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed; order of the County Court affirmed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment