Wilkin -Shaw v Fuller & Ors [2012] EWHC 1777 (QB) (28 June 2012)

Wilkin -Shaw v Fuller & Ors [2012] EWHC 1777 (QB) (28 June 2012)

The court found that the first defendant and his team were competent and acted with appropriate care in planning, training, and supervising the group. The decision to allow remote supervision was reasonable given the group's demonstrated abilities. The failure to meet the group at Watern Tor was not due to incompetence but to navigational error in adverse weather. The group was properly trained regarding water crossings. The accident was not a foreseeable consequence of any breach of duty by the defendants, and the intervention of Mr Wills did not break the chain of causation. There was no breach of duty by the defendants, and the claim failed.

Citation
[2012] EWHC 1777
Parties
Claimant: Jennifer Wilkin-Shaw (Administratrix of the Estate of Charlotte Shaw (Deceased)); First Defendant: Christopher Fuller; Second Defendant: Kingsley School Bideford Enterprises Limited (formerly Edgehill College Enterprises Limited)
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
28 June 2012
Procedural Posture
Civil Negligence (personal Injury/fatal Accident) / High Court Trial Judgment
Outcome
Claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Negligence, Duty of Care, Vicarious Liability, Causation, Novus Actus Interveniens, Standard of Care, Personal Injury, Compensation Act 2006, Outdoor Activities Liability
Tort Law Education Law Negligence Duty of Care Vicarious Liability Causation Novus Actus Interveniens Standard of Care +3 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jennifer Wilkin-Shaw (Administratrix of the Estate of Charlotte Shaw (Deceased))

Claimant

Christopher Fuller

First Defendant

Kingsley School Bideford Enterprises Limited (formerly Edgehill College Enterprises Limited)

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Negligence (personal Injury/fatal Accident) / High Court Trial Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendants breached their duty of care to Charlotte Shaw during Ten Tors training
  2. 2 Whether the school ensured staff were competent to supervise
  3. 3 Whether the accident was a reasonably foreseeable consequence of any negligence

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the first defendant and his team were competent and acted with appropriate care in planning, training, and supervising the group. The decision to allow remote supervision was reasonable given the group's demonstrated abilities. The failure to meet the group at Watern Tor was not due to incompetence but to navigational error in adverse weather. The group was properly trained regarding water crossings. The accident was not a foreseeable consequence of any breach of duty by the defendants, and the intervention of Mr Wills did not break the chain of causation. There was no breach of duty by the defendants, and the claim failed.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed