Kevin Lillington v Ministry of Defence [2015] EWCA Civ 775 (24 July 2015)
The trial judge was entitled to find, on the balance of probabilities, that the claimant would have passed the 2009 JCC and been promoted if the Ministry of Defence had complied with his medical restrictions. Any factual errors identified did not undermine the judge’s overall evaluation of the evidence and conclusion on causation and damages.
- Citation
- [2015] EWCA Civ 775
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Kevin Lillington; Defendant/appellant: Ministry of Defence
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 July 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Duty of Care, Causation, Damages, Loss of Earnings, Military Law
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kevin Lillington
Claimant/respondent
Ministry of Defence
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant would have passed the 2009 JCC and been promoted if the Ministry of Defence had complied with his medical restrictions
- 2 Whether the trial judge's findings on causation and damages were justified given alleged factual errors
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge was entitled to find, on the balance of probabilities, that the claimant would have passed the 2009 JCC and been promoted if the Ministry of Defence had complied with his medical restrictions. Any factual errors identified did not undermine the judge’s overall evaluation of the evidence and conclusion on causation and damages.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal by the Ministry of Defence is dismissed.
- The judgment of the County Court awarding damages to the claimant stands.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment