Kevin Lillington v Ministry of Defence [2015] EWCA Civ 775 (24 July 2015)

Kevin Lillington v Ministry of Defence [2015] EWCA Civ 775 (24 July 2015)

The trial judge was entitled to find, on the balance of probabilities, that the claimant would have passed the 2009 JCC and been promoted if the Ministry of Defence had complied with his medical restrictions. Any factual errors identified did not undermine the judge’s overall evaluation of the evidence and conclusion on causation and damages.

Citation
[2015] EWCA Civ 775
Parties
Claimant/respondent: Kevin Lillington; Defendant/appellant: Ministry of Defence
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
24 July 2015
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Negligence, Duty of Care, Causation, Damages, Loss of Earnings, Military Law

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kevin Lillington

Claimant/respondent

Ministry of Defence

Defendant/appellant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the claimant would have passed the 2009 JCC and been promoted if the Ministry of Defence had complied with his medical restrictions
  2. 2 Whether the trial judge's findings on causation and damages were justified given alleged factual errors

Ratio Decidendi

The trial judge was entitled to find, on the balance of probabilities, that the claimant would have passed the 2009 JCC and been promoted if the Ministry of Defence had complied with his medical restrictions. Any factual errors identified did not undermine the judge’s overall evaluation of the evidence and conclusion on causation and damages.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal by the Ministry of Defence is dismissed.
  • The judgment of the County Court awarding damages to the claimant stands.