Laws v Williams & Anor [2018] EWHC 1871 (QB) (18 July 2018)
The defendant was not negligent; her decision to slow or stop was reasonable in the circumstances as entering the main road would have caused other traffic to brake, which would have been unsafe. Her actions were those of a reasonably competent driver and in accordance with good practice. The claimant failed to keep a safe distance and did not look ahead before accelerating, contributing to the accident.
- Citation
- [2018] EWHC 1871
- Parties
- Claimant: Andrew Laws; First Defendant: Frances Williams; Second Defendant: Aviva Insurance Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 July 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury Claim / Trial of Preliminary Issues (negligence and Contributory Negligence)
- Outcome
- Judgment for the defendant
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Contributory Negligence, Road Traffic Accident, Standard of Care, Highway Code
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Andrew Laws
Claimant
Frances Williams
First Defendant
Aviva Insurance Limited
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury Claim / Trial of Preliminary Issues (negligence and Contributory Negligence)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the first defendant was negligent in slowing or stopping her car on the slip road
- 2 If so, whether and to what extent the claimant contributed to the accident
Ratio Decidendi
The defendant was not negligent; her decision to slow or stop was reasonable in the circumstances as entering the main road would have caused other traffic to brake, which would have been unsafe. Her actions were those of a reasonably competent driver and in accordance with good practice. The claimant failed to keep a safe distance and did not look ahead before accelerating, contributing to the accident.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the defendant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment