Elbanna v Clark [2025] EWCA Civ 223 (11 February 2025)
Permission to appeal is granted on the grounds that the trial judge's reference to recklessness may have introduced an error of law or inadequacy in reasoning, warranting determination by the full court.
- Citation
- [2025] EWCA Civ 223
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Mr Omar Elbanna; Defendant/appellant: Mr Tom Clark
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 February 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Permission to Appeal Granted on Specified Grounds
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal granted on grounds one, two and five; refused on grounds three, four, six and seven.
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Recklessness, Standard of Care, Appeal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Omar Elbanna
Claimant/respondent
Mr Tom Clark
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Permission to Appeal Granted on Specified Grounds
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge applied the correct legal standard (negligence vs recklessness) in finding liability against the defendant
- 2 Whether the judge's reasons were adequate regarding the reference to recklessness
- 3 Whether findings of fact could be reopened on appeal
Ratio Decidendi
Permission to appeal is granted on the grounds that the trial judge's reference to recklessness may have introduced an error of law or inadequacy in reasoning, warranting determination by the full court.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal granted on grounds one, two and five; refused on grounds three, four, six and seven.
Orders
- Permission to appeal allowed on grounds one, two and five.
- Leave to appeal refused on grounds three, four, six and seven.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment