King v Department of the Environment, Transport & the Regions

King v Department of the Environment, Transport & the Regions

The Court of Appeal held that there was no negligence on the part of the defendant highway authority. The cause of the accident was the claimant's failure to register road markings, signs, and the presence of the roundabout, not the design. The roundabout was well lit and signposted, and the design did not create a hazard for a reasonably attentive driver. The judge's finding of negligence and causation was set aside.

Parties
Claimant / Respondent: Tommy Francis King; Defendant / Appellant: Department of the Environment, Transport & The Regions
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
23 May 2003
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (queen's Bench Division) to Court of Appeal
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Negligence, Highway Authority Duty, Contributory Negligence, Causation
Tort Law Road Traffic Law Public Authority Liability Negligence Highway Authority Duty Contributory Negligence Causation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Tommy Francis King

Claimant / Respondent

Department of the Environment, Transport & The Regions

Defendant / Appellant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (queen's Bench Division) to Court of Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the design of the roundabout and approach road was negligent
  2. 2 Whether any negligence in design caused the claimant's accident
  3. 3 Appropriate apportionment of contributory negligence

Ratio Decidendi

The Court of Appeal held that there was no negligence on the part of the defendant highway authority. The cause of the accident was the claimant's failure to register road markings, signs, and the presence of the roundabout, not the design. The roundabout was well lit and signposted, and the design did not create a hazard for a reasonably attentive driver. The judge's finding of negligence and causation was set aside.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • Order of the High Court set aside
  • Appellant to pay respondent's costs, to be assessed by a costs judge