Bland & Anor v Morris & Anor
The trial judge was entitled to find Mrs Morris two-thirds to blame and Mr Bland one-third to blame for the accident, given Mrs Morris's failure to move the coach to a safe place or evacuate the passengers, her greater responsibility as the coach driver, and the evidence regarding the time available to take action. The judge's findings of fact and apportionment were not plainly wrong and should not be disturbed on appeal.
- Parties
- Respondent/claimant: Simon Paul Bland; Respondent/claimant: Rathbones Bakeries Ltd; Appellant/defendant: Jeanette Priscilla Morris; Appellant/defendant: Ministry of Defence
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 January 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (queen's Bench Division)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Apportionment of Liability, Duty of Care, Road Traffic Accidents, Contributory Negligence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Simon Paul Bland
Respondent/claimant
Rathbones Bakeries Ltd
Respondent/claimant
Jeanette Priscilla Morris
Appellant/defendant
Ministry of Defence
Appellant/defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (queen's Bench Division)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge erred in apportioning two-thirds of the blame for a fatal road traffic accident to Mrs Morris and one-third to Mr Bland.
- 2 Whether Mrs Morris owed a greater duty of care to the passengers than Mr Bland.
- 3 Whether the judge failed to give proper weight to Mr Bland's negligence.
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge was entitled to find Mrs Morris two-thirds to blame and Mr Bland one-third to blame for the accident, given Mrs Morris's failure to move the coach to a safe place or evacuate the passengers, her greater responsibility as the coach driver, and the evidence regarding the time available to take action. The judge's findings of fact and apportionment were not plainly wrong and should not be disturbed on appeal.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Parties to use best endeavours to agree costs, with disagreements to be submitted for summary assessment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment