Bishara v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust

Bishara v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust

The appeal was allowed because it could not be said that the appellant's claim had no real prospect of success without a trial of the facts. If the appellant's account is believed, there is an arguable case that a duty of care arose due to sufficient proximity and the circumstances, and the matter should proceed to trial.

Parties
Claimant/appellant: Bishara; Defendant/respondent: Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
26 March 2007
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Against Summary Judgment (striking Out of Claim)
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Negligence, Duty of Care, Summary Judgment, Personal Injury
Tort Law Negligence Duty of Care Summary Judgment Personal Injury

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Bishara

Claimant/appellant

Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal Against Summary Judgment (striking Out of Claim)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the respondent owed a duty of care to the appellant in the circumstances alleged
  2. 2 Whether the claim should have been struck out as having no real prospect of success

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was allowed because it could not be said that the appellant's claim had no real prospect of success without a trial of the facts. If the appellant's account is believed, there is an arguable case that a duty of care arose due to sufficient proximity and the circumstances, and the matter should proceed to trial.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • Orders of HHJ Hampton (30 June 2006) and District Judge Hudson (20 February 2006) set aside
  • Defendant's application for summary judgment dismissed