Cole v Davies-Gilbert & Ors

Cole v Davies-Gilbert & Ors

There was no evidential basis for concluding that the Royal British Legion breached its duty of care to the claimant. The hole was adequately filled after the 1999 fête, and the accident occurred 21 months later with no evidence of prior exposure. The owner/occupier was not liable as they had no involvement in the fête or maintenance of the hole and could reasonably assume it was safe. Causation was not established between any alleged breach and the injury.

Parties
Claimant/appellant/respondent: Yvonne Carol Cole; 1st Defendant/respondent/cross Appellant: Charles Beresford Davies-Gilbert; 2nd Defendant: CJ Davies-Gilbert; 3rd Defendant: The Gilbert Estate; 4th Defendant: East Dean & Friston Parish Council; 5th Defendant/appellant/respondent: The Royal British Legion
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
01 March 2007
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Outcome
Appeal by the Royal British Legion allowed; claimant's appeal against the first defendant dismissed.
Legal Topics
Negligence, Occupiers' Liability, Causation, Standard of Care
Tort Law Personal Injury Negligence Occupiers' Liability Causation Standard of Care

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Yvonne Carol Cole

Claimant/appellant/respondent

Charles Beresford Davies-Gilbert

1st Defendant/respondent/cross Appellant

CJ Davies-Gilbert

2nd Defendant

The Gilbert Estate

3rd Defendant

East Dean & Friston Parish Council

4th Defendant

The Royal British Legion

5th Defendant/appellant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Royal British Legion breached its duty of care to the claimant by failing to adequately fill the maypole hole after the 1999 fête
  2. 2 Whether the owner/occupier of the village green (1st Defendant) was liable under the Occupiers' Liability Act 1957 or common law negligence
  3. 3 Whether causation was established between any breach and the claimant's injury

Ratio Decidendi

There was no evidential basis for concluding that the Royal British Legion breached its duty of care to the claimant. The hole was adequately filled after the 1999 fête, and the accident occurred 21 months later with no evidence of prior exposure. The owner/occupier was not liable as they had no involvement in the fête or maintenance of the hole and could reasonably assume it was safe. Causation was not established between any alleged breach and the injury.

Court Disposition

Appeal by the Royal British Legion allowed; claimant's appeal against the first defendant dismissed.

Orders

  • No order for costs below in favour of the fifth defendant (Royal British Legion)
  • Appellant to pay one-third of the fifth defendant's costs of the appeal