Shane Byrne v Motorsport Vision Racing Limited & Ors

Shane Byrne v Motorsport Vision Racing Limited & Ors

The defendants breached their duty of care by failing to provide Type A additional protective devices at Turn 3, a foreseeable risk area for high-speed motorcycle crashes. The claimant did not willingly accept the risk of collision with the barrier as designed, nor was he contributorily negligent. The injuries were caused by the impact with the barrier, which would have been avoided or reduced with proper safety devices. All defendants are liable for the claimant's injuries.

Parties
Claimant: Shane Byrne; First Defendant: Motorsport Vision Racing Limited; Second Defendant: Motorsport Vision Limited; Fourth Defendant: The Motorcycle Circuit Racing Control Board Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
29 November 2024
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury Claim / Judgment on Liability
Outcome
Defendants found liable for claimant's injuries
Legal Topics
Negligence, Duty of Care, Volenti Non Fit Injuria, Unfair Contract Terms, Motorcycle Racing Safety, Causation, Expert Evidence
Tort Personal Injury Occupiers' Liability Negligence Duty of Care Volenti Non Fit Injuria Unfair Contract Terms Motorcycle Racing Safety +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Shane Byrne

Claimant

Motorsport Vision Racing Limited

First Defendant

Motorsport Vision Limited

Second Defendant

The Motorcycle Circuit Racing Control Board Limited

Fourth Defendant

Procedural Posture

Personal Injury Claim / Judgment on Liability

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendants owed a duty of care to the claimant under the Occupiers' Liability Act 1957 and common law
  2. 2 Whether the defendants breached their duty of care by failing to provide adequate safety precautions at Turn 3
  3. 3 Whether the claimant willingly accepted the risk (volenti non fit injuria)

Ratio Decidendi

The defendants breached their duty of care by failing to provide Type A additional protective devices at Turn 3, a foreseeable risk area for high-speed motorcycle crashes. The claimant did not willingly accept the risk of collision with the barrier as designed, nor was he contributorily negligent. The injuries were caused by the impact with the barrier, which would have been avoided or reduced with proper safety devices. All defendants are liable for the claimant's injuries.

Court Disposition

Defendants found liable for claimant's injuries

Orders

  • Liability established against all defendants
  • Quantum of damages to be assessed separately if not agreed