Smith v Liverpool City Council & Ors
The claimant had actual knowledge of the relevant facts by 20 October 1998, more than three years before the claim was issued, and the prejudice to the defendants from the passage of time was substantial; it was not equitable to disapply the limitation period under Limitation Act 1980 s.33.
- Parties
- Claimant: Richard Smith; First Defendant: Liverpool City Council; Second Defendant: Hampshire County Council; Third Defendant: Knowsley Metropolitan Borough Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 April 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment on Preliminary Issues
- Outcome
- Action dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Limitation Period, Special Educational Needs, Dyslexia, Statutory Assessment, Statement of Special Educational Needs, Res Ipsa Loquitur
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Richard Smith
Claimant
Liverpool City Council
First Defendant
Hampshire County Council
Second Defendant
Knowsley Metropolitan Borough Council
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment on Preliminary Issues
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant suffered a psychological or psychiatric injury sufficient to constitute a personal injury
- 2 When did the claimant acquire actual or constructive knowledge for purposes of Limitation Act 1980 s.11(4)(b)
- 3 Whether the limitation period should be disapplied under Limitation Act 1980 s.33
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant had actual knowledge of the relevant facts by 20 October 1998, more than three years before the claim was issued, and the prejudice to the defendants from the passage of time was substantial; it was not equitable to disapply the limitation period under Limitation Act 1980 s.33.
Court Disposition
Action dismissed
Orders
- Claim dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment