PT Civil Engineering v Davies

PT Civil Engineering v Davies

The claimant failed to prove, on a balance of probabilities, that the defendant's negligence caused the fire; the evidence did not support an inference that poor maintenance was causally linked to the fire, and thus liability could not be established under res ipsa loquitur or general negligence principles.

Parties
Appellant/defendant: PT Civil Engineering; Respondent/claimant: Paul Barry Davies
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
30 June 2017
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
Appeal allowed; claim dismissed.
Legal Topics
Negligence, Res Ipsa Loquitur, Burden of Proof, Employer's Liability
Tort Law Personal Injury Negligence Res Ipsa Loquitur Burden of Proof Employer's Liability

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

PT Civil Engineering

Appellant/defendant

Paul Barry Davies

Respondent/claimant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendant's negligence caused the fire and resulting personal injuries
  2. 2 Whether the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur applies to infer negligence from the unexplained fire

Ratio Decidendi

The claimant failed to prove, on a balance of probabilities, that the defendant's negligence caused the fire; the evidence did not support an inference that poor maintenance was causally linked to the fire, and thus liability could not be established under res ipsa loquitur or general negligence principles.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; claim dismissed.

Orders

  • Judgment for the claimant set aside
  • Order for costs against defendant set aside