Mohmed v Barnes & Anor

The defendant acted reasonably in a threatening and rapidly developing situation and did not fall below the standard of a reasonable driver; therefore, he is not liable in negligence.

Parties: Claimant: Suhail Mohmed; First Defendant: Elliot Barnes; Second Defendant: EUI Limited
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
Judgment Date: 24 January 2019
Procedural Posture: Negligence Claim / Trial of Preliminary Issues on Liability and Contributory Negligence
Outcome: Claim dismissed; defendant exonerated from liability in negligence.
Legal Topics: Negligence, Self Defence, Necessity, Hearsay Evidence, Liability for Personal Injury

Tort Law Negligence Self Defence Necessity Hearsay Evidence Liability for Personal Injury

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2

Parties

Suhail Mohmed

Claimant

Elliot Barnes

First Defendant

EUI Limited

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Negligence Claim / Trial of Preliminary Issues on Liability and Contributory Negligence

Legal Issues

1 Whether the defendant was negligent in colliding with the claimant
2 Whether the defendant could rely on self-defence or necessity
3 Whether the claimant or others contributed to the incident

Ratio Decidendi

The defendant acted reasonably in a threatening and rapidly developing situation and did not fall below the standard of a reasonable driver; therefore, he is not liable in negligence.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed; defendant exonerated from liability in negligence.