Legal & General Assurance Ltd v Kirk [2001] EWCA Civ 1803 (14 November 2001)
No cause of action for negligent misstatement arises where no reference is given to a third party and the alleged misstatement is not relied upon by the claimant; Article 1 of Protocol 1 ECHR is not engaged in the context of private employment rights absent a public authority or licence.
- Citation
- [2001] EWCA Civ 1803
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Legal & General Assurance Ltd; Defendant/applicant: Phillip Kirk
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 November 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Chancery Division to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Negligent Misstatement, Duty of Care, References for Former Employees, Human Rights, Article 1 Protocol 1 ECHR
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Legal & General Assurance Ltd
Claimant/respondent
Phillip Kirk
Defendant/applicant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Chancery Division to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a duty of care arises for negligent misstatement where no reference is given to a third party
- 2 Whether the assertion of an 'industry debt' by an employer to an ex-employee can found a claim for negligent misstatement
- 3 Whether Article 1 of Protocol 1 ECHR is engaged in the context of private employment rights
Ratio Decidendi
No cause of action for negligent misstatement arises where no reference is given to a third party and the alleged misstatement is not relied upon by the claimant; Article 1 of Protocol 1 ECHR is not engaged in the context of private employment rights absent a public authority or licence.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Order as minuted by counsel
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment