Insurance Corporation of the Channel Islands v Royal Insurance (UK) Ltd [1997] EWHC 373 (Comm) (30 July 1997)

Insurance Corporation of the Channel Islands v Royal Insurance (UK) Ltd [1997] EWHC 373 (Comm) (30 July 1997)

Royal Hotel's creation of false invoices prior to renewal constituted material non-disclosure and moral hazard. ICCI and Royal Insurance were induced to renew the policy by ignorance of this conduct. Insurers did not affirm the contract after acquiring sufficient knowledge. Avoidance of the material damage policy is justified.

Citation
[1997] EWHC 373 (Comm)
Parties
First Plaintiff: Insurance Corporation of the Channel Islands; Second Plaintiff: Royal Insurance (UK) Limited; Defendants: The Royal Hotel Limited and others
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
30 July 1997
Procedural Posture
Commercial Insurance Dispute / Judgment After Trial
Outcome
Material damage policy avoided for material non-disclosure; insurers entitled to avoid.
Legal Topics
Non Disclosure, Materiality, Inducement, Affirmation, Moral Hazard, Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Issue Estoppel, Abuse of Process

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 19 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Insurance Corporation of the Channel Islands

First Plaintiff

Royal Insurance (UK) Limited

Second Plaintiff

The Royal Hotel Limited and others

Defendants

Procedural Posture

Commercial Insurance Dispute / Judgment After Trial

  1. 1 Whether Royal Hotel's conduct constituted material non-disclosure justifying avoidance of the insurance policy
  2. 2 Whether ICCI and Royal Insurance were induced by non-disclosure to renew the policy
  3. 3 Whether insurers affirmed the contract after knowledge of the relevant facts

Ratio Decidendi

Royal Hotel's creation of false invoices prior to renewal constituted material non-disclosure and moral hazard. ICCI and Royal Insurance were induced to renew the policy by ignorance of this conduct. Insurers did not affirm the contract after acquiring sufficient knowledge. Avoidance of the material damage policy is justified.

Court Disposition

Material damage policy avoided for material non-disclosure; insurers entitled to avoid.

Orders

  • Policy avoided ab initio
  • Royal Hotel not entitled to claim under material damage policy