Spencer v Spencer [2002] EWCA Civ 706 (7 May 2002)
There was no misdirection or error in the County Court's handling of the case; the application for permission to appeal was out of time and the orders in question had expired, rendering the appeal academic.
- Citation
- [2002] EWCA Civ 706
- Parties
- Applicant/respondent: Susan Mary Spencer; Respondent/applicant: Paul David Spencer
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 May 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (family Law Non Molestation/committal) / Application for Permission to Appeal to Court of Appeal From County Court Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for permission to appeal and extension of time refused.
- Legal Topics
- Non Molestation Injunction, Committal for Breach of Injunction, Appeal Procedure, Extension of Time, Access to Justice Act 1999
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Susan Mary Spencer
Applicant/respondent
Paul David Spencer
Respondent/applicant
Procedural Posture
Appeal (family Law Non Molestation/committal) / Application for Permission to Appeal to Court of Appeal From County Court Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there was procedural unfairness in the original and committal proceedings
- 2 Whether the appeal to the Court of Appeal is competent and in time
- 3 Whether expired orders justify appellate intervention
Ratio Decidendi
There was no misdirection or error in the County Court's handling of the case; the application for permission to appeal was out of time and the orders in question had expired, rendering the appeal academic.
Court Disposition
Application for permission to appeal and extension of time refused.
Orders
- Permission to appeal refused.
- Extension of time refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment