Excalibur Ventures LLC v Texas Keystone Inc & Ors (Rev 2) [2014] EWHC 3436 (Comm) (23 October 2014)
Non-party funders who substantially funded and stood to benefit from the litigation, and who were the real parties to it, are jointly and severally liable for the Defendants' costs, assessed on the indemnity scale. The Arkin cap applies to limit each funder's liability to the amount funded unless dishonesty or impropriety is shown. The speculative and opportunistic nature of the claim, and the funders' roles, justify indemnity costs.
- Citation
- [2014] EWHC 3436 (Comm)
- Parties
- Claimant: Excalibur Ventures LLC; Defendant/costs Claimant: Texas Keystone Inc.; Defendant/costs Claimant: Gulf Keystone Petroleum Limited; Defendant/costs Claimant: Gulf Keystone Petroleum International Limited; Defendant/costs Claimant: Gulf Keystone Petroleum (UK) Limited; Costs Defendant: Psari Holdings Limited; Costs Defendant: Mr Andonis Lemos; Costs Defendant: Blackrobe Capital Partners LLC; Costs Defendant: Blackrobe AEO I Investors LLC; Costs Defendant: Platinum Partners Value Arbitrage Fund LP; Costs Defendant: Hamilton Capital LLC; Costs Defendant: JH Funding LLC; Costs Defendant: Huron Capital LLC; Costs Defendant: Platinum Partners Credit Opportunities Master Fund LP
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 October 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Court Costs Application / Post Trial, Costs Determination After Dismissal of Main Claim
- Outcome
- Non-party costs order granted against funders; costs to be assessed on the indemnity basis, subject to the Arkin cap.
- Legal Topics
- Non Party Costs Orders, Indemnity Costs, Litigation Funding Liability, Arkin Cap, Section 51 Senior Courts Act 1981
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Excalibur Ventures LLC
Claimant
Texas Keystone Inc.
Defendant/costs Claimant
Gulf Keystone Petroleum Limited
Defendant/costs Claimant
Gulf Keystone Petroleum International Limited
Defendant/costs Claimant
Gulf Keystone Petroleum (UK) Limited
Defendant/costs Claimant
Psari Holdings Limited
Costs Defendant
Mr Andonis Lemos
Costs Defendant
Blackrobe Capital Partners LLC
Costs Defendant
Blackrobe AEO I Investors LLC
Costs Defendant
Platinum Partners Value Arbitrage Fund LP
Costs Defendant
Hamilton Capital LLC
Costs Defendant
JH Funding LLC
Costs Defendant
Huron Capital LLC
Costs Defendant
Platinum Partners Credit Opportunities Master Fund LP
Costs Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Court Costs Application / Post Trial, Costs Determination After Dismissal of Main Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 Should non-party funders be held jointly and severally liable for the Defendants' costs?
- 2 Should costs be assessed on the indemnity scale?
- 3 How should the Arkin cap be applied to litigation funders?
Ratio Decidendi
Non-party funders who substantially funded and stood to benefit from the litigation, and who were the real parties to it, are jointly and severally liable for the Defendants' costs, assessed on the indemnity scale. The Arkin cap applies to limit each funder's liability to the amount funded unless dishonesty or impropriety is shown. The speculative and opportunistic nature of the claim, and the funders' roles, justify indemnity costs.
Court Disposition
Non-party costs order granted against funders; costs to be assessed on the indemnity basis, subject to the Arkin cap.
Orders
- Psari Holdings Limited and Mr Andonis Lemos held jointly and severally liable for Defendants' costs on the indemnity scale, subject to the Arkin cap.
- Hamilton Capital LLC, JH Funding LLC, Huron Capital LLC, Platinum Partners Value Arbitrage Fund LP, and Blackrobe AEO I Investors LLC held liable for costs to the extent of their funding (Arkin cap).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment