Legg & Ors v Sterte Garage Ltd & Anor [2016] EWCA Civ 97 (23 February 2016)
The insurers, having taken over and funded the defence of the claim for their own interests and having withdrawn when the claim was amended but not abandoned as to the covered event, were properly subject to a non-party costs order under section 51(3) of the Senior Courts Act 1981. Additionally, the policy wording entitled the insured to indemnity for the costs order, and this right vested in the claimants under the Third Party (Rights Against Insurers) Act 1930.
- Citation
- [2016] EWCA Civ 97
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Ewart Charles Legg; Claimant/respondent: Valerie Ivena Isabel Legg; Claimant/respondent: Tina Taylor; Claimant/respondent: Tracey Lee; Claimant/respondent: Francis Lee; Claimant/respondent: Eileen Porter; Claimant/respondent: Julie Ann Dorey; First Defendant: Sterte Garage Limited; Second Defendant/appellant: Aviva UK Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 February 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (civil) / Appeal From County Court Final Costs Order
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Non Party Costs Orders, Third Party (rights Against Insurers) Act 1930, Public Liability Insurance, Pollution Exclusion Clauses, Limitation of Actions, Nuisance, Negligence, Rylands V Fletcher Liability
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ewart Charles Legg
Claimant/respondent
Valerie Ivena Isabel Legg
Claimant/respondent
Tina Taylor
Claimant/respondent
Tracey Lee
Claimant/respondent
Francis Lee
Claimant/respondent
Eileen Porter
Claimant/respondent
Julie Ann Dorey
Claimant/respondent
Sterte Garage Limited
First Defendant
Aviva UK Limited
Second Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal (civil) / Appeal From County Court Final Costs Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a non-party costs order should be made against insurers under section 51(3) of the Senior Courts Act 1981
- 2 Whether claimants are entitled to indemnity for costs under the insurance policy and the Third Party (Rights Against Insurers) Act 1930
Ratio Decidendi
The insurers, having taken over and funded the defence of the claim for their own interests and having withdrawn when the claim was amended but not abandoned as to the covered event, were properly subject to a non-party costs order under section 51(3) of the Senior Courts Act 1981. Additionally, the policy wording entitled the insured to indemnity for the costs order, and this right vested in the claimants under the Third Party (Rights Against Insurers) Act 1930.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Insurers to pay claimants' costs of the proceedings as ordered by the County Court
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment