Kirby v Hoff

Kirby v Hoff

Mr Kirby controlled, funded, and stood to benefit from the litigation, and his conduct in commencing and abandoning proceedings without commercial rationale or explanation amounted to impropriety, justifying a non-party costs order against him.

Parties
Applicant/claimant: Adrian Kirby; Respondent/defendant: Alexander Hoff
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
23 November 2010
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Non Party Costs Order
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Non Party Costs Orders, Corporate Control, Litigation Funding, Impropriety in Litigation
Civil Procedure Company Law Non Party Costs Orders Corporate Control Litigation Funding Impropriety in Litigation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 12
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Adrian Kirby

Applicant/claimant

Alexander Hoff

Respondent/defendant

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Non Party Costs Order

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a non-party costs order should be made against Mr Kirby
  2. 2 Whether Mr Kirby's conduct amounted to impropriety or bad faith
  3. 3 Extent of control, funding, and benefit by Mr Kirby in the litigation

Ratio Decidendi

Mr Kirby controlled, funded, and stood to benefit from the litigation, and his conduct in commencing and abandoning proceedings without commercial rationale or explanation amounted to impropriety, justifying a non-party costs order against him.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Non-party costs order against Mr Kirby upheld
  • Mr Kirby to pay Mr Hoff's costs of the proceedings