Goknur Gida Maddeleri Enerji Imalat Ithalat Ihracat Ticaret Ve Sanati A.S. v Organic Village Ltd & Anor (Rev 1)

Goknur Gida Maddeleri Enerji Imalat Ithalat Ihracat Ticaret Ve Sanati A.S. v Organic Village Ltd & Anor (Rev 1)

A non-party costs order should not be made against Mr Aytacli because, although he controlled and funded the litigation, he did so in good faith for the benefit of Organic Village and its creditors, not for his own benefit, and there was no impropriety or bad faith. The exceptional circumstances required for such an order against a director were not met. Further, the costs outcome resulted from Organic Village's inability to fund detailed assessment, not from any abuse or manipulation by Mr Aytacli.

Parties
Claimant: Goknur Gida Maddeleri Enerji Imalat Ithalat Ihracat Ticaret ve Sanati A.S.; First Defendant: Organic Village Ltd; Second Defendant: Mr Cengiz Aytacli
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
30 September 2020
Procedural Posture
Application for Non Party Costs Order / Post Trial Application
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Non Party Costs Orders, Directors' Liability for Costs, Litigation Funding, Costs Assessment

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 10
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Goknur Gida Maddeleri Enerji Imalat Ithalat Ihracat Ticaret ve Sanati A.S.

Claimant

Organic Village Ltd

First Defendant

Mr Cengiz Aytacli

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Application for Non Party Costs Order / Post Trial Application

  1. 1 Whether a non-party costs order should be made against Mr Aytacli, former director of Organic Village Ltd, under section 51 of the Senior Courts Act 1981 and CPR 46.2

Ratio Decidendi

A non-party costs order should not be made against Mr Aytacli because, although he controlled and funded the litigation, he did so in good faith for the benefit of Organic Village and its creditors, not for his own benefit, and there was no impropriety or bad faith. The exceptional circumstances required for such an order against a director were not met. Further, the costs outcome resulted from Organic Village's inability to fund detailed assessment, not from any abuse or manipulation by Mr Aytacli.

Court Disposition

application dismissed