BNP Paribas v Ths Global Ltd & Ors
The court found that the threshold requirements for Norwich Pharmacal relief were satisfied: there was a reasonable basis for concluding BNPP may be a victim of wrongdoing, and BNPP needed the information to identify potential wrongdoers and assert its rights. The Defendants' proposed limited disclosure was inadequate. The court exercised its discretion to order disclosure of documents as sought by BNPP, but declined to order affidavits at this stage as such orders would be too broad, potentially oppressive, and not necessary before document disclosure.
- Parties
- Claimant: BNP Paribas; First Defendant: TH Global Limited; Second Defendant: Spinaker Limited; Third Defendant: Kvaerner 2004 (No 2) Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 January 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Part 8 Claim (disclosure Application) / Judgment on Application for Norwich Pharmacal Disclosure Order
- Outcome
- Application granted in part
- Legal Topics
- Norwich Pharmacal Orders, Pre Action Disclosure, Shareholder Rights, Corporate Restructuring, Asset Tracing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
BNP Paribas
Claimant
TH Global Limited
First Defendant
Spinaker Limited
Second Defendant
Kvaerner 2004 (No 2) Limited
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Part 8 Claim (disclosure Application) / Judgment on Application for Norwich Pharmacal Disclosure Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the requirements for Norwich Pharmacal relief are satisfied
- 2 Whether the scope of disclosure should be limited to the Defendants' proposal or extended as sought by the Claimant
- 3 Whether affidavits should be ordered in addition to document disclosure
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the threshold requirements for Norwich Pharmacal relief were satisfied: there was a reasonable basis for concluding BNPP may be a victim of wrongdoing, and BNPP needed the information to identify potential wrongdoers and assert its rights. The Defendants' proposed limited disclosure was inadequate. The court exercised its discretion to order disclosure of documents as sought by BNPP, but declined to order affidavits at this stage as such orders would be too broad, potentially oppressive, and not necessary before document disclosure.
Court Disposition
Application granted in part
Orders
- Order for disclosure of documents as sought by BNPP, subject to detailed drafting and provisions for confidentiality, privilege, and costs.
- No order for provision of affidavits at this stage.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment