JSC BTA Bank v Solodchenko & Ors
Given the inadequacy of the 17th defendant's disclosure, the evidence suggesting he has further relevant knowledge, and the urgency and scale of the alleged fraud, it is just and convenient to order his cross-examination to ensure compliance with the disclosure order.
- Parties
- Claimant/applicant: JSC BTA Bank; Defendants: Roman Vladimirovich Solodchenko and Others; 17th Defendant/respondent: Anatoly Ereshchenko
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 April 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (chancery Division) / Interlocutory Application for Cross Examination on Compliance With Disclosure Order
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- Norwich Pharmacal Orders, Bankers Trust Jurisdiction, Freezing Injunctions, Disclosure Orders, Cross Examination on Affidavits, Tracing of Assets
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
JSC BTA Bank
Claimant/applicant
Roman Vladimirovich Solodchenko and Others
Defendants
Anatoly Ereshchenko
17th Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil (chancery Division) / Interlocutory Application for Cross Examination on Compliance With Disclosure Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 17th defendant should be ordered to attend for cross-examination regarding compliance with a disclosure order
- 2 Whether the existing disclosure by the 17th defendant is adequate
- 3 Whether cross-examination is just and convenient in the circumstances
Ratio Decidendi
Given the inadequacy of the 17th defendant's disclosure, the evidence suggesting he has further relevant knowledge, and the urgency and scale of the alleged fraud, it is just and convenient to order his cross-examination to ensure compliance with the disclosure order.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- The 17th defendant, Anatoly Ereshchenko, is ordered to attend for cross-examination on his compliance with the disclosure order.
- Cross-examination to take place on the first available date after 9 May 2011 convenient to the parties and their counsel.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment