Finning (UK) Ltd. v Inveresk Plc [2007] EWCA Civ 1563 (15 May 2007)

Finning (UK) Ltd. v Inveresk Plc [2007] EWCA Civ 1563 (15 May 2007)

There was no full novation of the hire agreements to Klippan because Klippan did not accept all terms, particularly regarding early termination charges, and Inveresk did not participate in or consent to the variation. The arrangement constituted a partial novation or variation, discharging Inveresk only for hire charges up to 31 December 2003, but not for early termination charges, for which Inveresk remained liable. The original Particulars of Claim were adequate, and the costs orders made by HHJ Knight should be restored as the judge at first instance exercised his discretion properly.

Citation
[2007] EWCA Civ 1563
Parties
Claimant/respondent: Finning (UK) Ltd; Defendant/appellant: Inveresk plc
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
15 May 2007
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From Central London County Court and High Court (mercantile Court)
Outcome
Appeal by Inveresk dismissed; costs appeal by Finning allowed; original costs orders restored.
Legal Topics
Novation, Assignment, Hire Agreements, Early Termination Charges, Costs Orders, Pleading Requirements

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Finning (UK) Ltd

Claimant/respondent

Inveresk plc

Defendant/appellant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From Central London County Court and High Court (mercantile Court)

  1. 1 Whether hire agreements between Lex and Inveresk were novated to Klippan, discharging Inveresk from liability for early termination charges
  2. 2 Whether the original Particulars of Claim were adequate and whether costs orders below were correct

Ratio Decidendi

There was no full novation of the hire agreements to Klippan because Klippan did not accept all terms, particularly regarding early termination charges, and Inveresk did not participate in or consent to the variation. The arrangement constituted a partial novation or variation, discharging Inveresk only for hire charges up to 31 December 2003, but not for early termination charges, for which Inveresk remained liable. The original Particulars of Claim were adequate, and the costs orders made by HHJ Knight should be restored as the judge at first instance exercised his discretion properly.

Court Disposition

Appeal by Inveresk dismissed; costs appeal by Finning allowed; original costs orders restored.

Orders

  • B2/2006/1747/A – Application refused.
  • B2/2006/1947 – Appeal dismissed.