Finning (UK) Ltd. v Inveresk Plc [2007] EWCA Civ 1563 (15 May 2007)
There was no full novation of the hire agreements to Klippan because Klippan did not accept all terms, particularly regarding early termination charges, and Inveresk did not participate in or consent to the variation. The arrangement constituted a partial novation or variation, discharging Inveresk only for hire charges up to 31 December 2003, but not for early termination charges, for which Inveresk remained liable. The original Particulars of Claim were adequate, and the costs orders made by HHJ Knight should be restored as the judge at first instance exercised his discretion properly.
- Citation
- [2007] EWCA Civ 1563
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Finning (UK) Ltd; Defendant/appellant: Inveresk plc
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 May 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From Central London County Court and High Court (mercantile Court)
- Outcome
- Appeal by Inveresk dismissed; costs appeal by Finning allowed; original costs orders restored.
- Legal Topics
- Novation, Assignment, Hire Agreements, Early Termination Charges, Costs Orders, Pleading Requirements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Finning (UK) Ltd
Claimant/respondent
Inveresk plc
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From Central London County Court and High Court (mercantile Court)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether hire agreements between Lex and Inveresk were novated to Klippan, discharging Inveresk from liability for early termination charges
- 2 Whether the original Particulars of Claim were adequate and whether costs orders below were correct
Ratio Decidendi
There was no full novation of the hire agreements to Klippan because Klippan did not accept all terms, particularly regarding early termination charges, and Inveresk did not participate in or consent to the variation. The arrangement constituted a partial novation or variation, discharging Inveresk only for hire charges up to 31 December 2003, but not for early termination charges, for which Inveresk remained liable. The original Particulars of Claim were adequate, and the costs orders made by HHJ Knight should be restored as the judge at first instance exercised his discretion properly.
Court Disposition
Appeal by Inveresk dismissed; costs appeal by Finning allowed; original costs orders restored.
Orders
- B2/2006/1747/A – Application refused.
- B2/2006/1947 – Appeal dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment