Habibsons Bank Ltd v Standard Chartered Bank (Hong Kong) Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 1335 (24 November 2010)

Habibsons Bank Ltd v Standard Chartered Bank (Hong Kong) Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 1335 (24 November 2010)

The Facility Agreement expressly permitted transfer by novation without the borrower's further consent, and the administration order under Dutch law did not affect this mechanism. The alteration of the transfer certificate was immaterial as the correct certificate was ultimately used, and there was no fraud or misconduct. The proposed amendments to the claim had no real prospect of success and were properly refused.

Citation
[2010] EWCA Civ 1335
Parties
Claimant/appellant: Habibsons Bank Ltd; Defendant/respondent: Standard Chartered Bank (Hong Kong) Ltd
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
24 November 2010
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Refusal to Amend Particulars of Claim; Appeal Dismissed
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Novation, Material Alteration of Instruments, Syndicated Loans, Authority of Agents, Amendment of Pleadings, Costs Orders

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Habibsons Bank Ltd

Claimant/appellant

Standard Chartered Bank (Hong Kong) Ltd

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Refusal to Amend Particulars of Claim; Appeal Dismissed

  1. 1 Whether the administration order under Dutch law prevented novation of the loan
  2. 2 Whether alteration of the transfer certificate rendered the transaction void
  3. 3 Whether the agent (BL) acted unlawfully in executing the transfer certificate

Ratio Decidendi

The Facility Agreement expressly permitted transfer by novation without the borrower's further consent, and the administration order under Dutch law did not affect this mechanism. The alteration of the transfer certificate was immaterial as the correct certificate was ultimately used, and there was no fraud or misconduct. The proposed amendments to the claim had no real prospect of success and were properly refused.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Permission to appeal granted (except as to costs)
  • Appeal dismissed