Piper & Anor v Clifford Kent Ltd. [2003] EWCA Civ 1692 (12 November 2003)
The judge's reliance on limited expert evidence and a single site visit was insufficient to displace consistent witness testimony of ongoing intermittent smell nuisance; therefore, the nuisance is continuing.
- Citation
- [2003] EWCA Civ 1692
- Parties
- Claimants/appellants: Mr and Mrs Piper; Defendant/respondent: Clifford Kent Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 November 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment, Remitted to County Court for Remedy Determination
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; finding of no continuing nuisance quashed; matter remitted to county court for determination of remedy.
- Legal Topics
- Nuisance, Remedies, Damages, Injunction
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr and Mrs Piper
Claimants/appellants
Clifford Kent Ltd
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment, Remitted to County Court for Remedy Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the smell nuisance ceased in 2000 or is continuing
- 2 Appropriate remedy for continuing nuisance
Ratio Decidendi
The judge's reliance on limited expert evidence and a single site visit was insufficient to displace consistent witness testimony of ongoing intermittent smell nuisance; therefore, the nuisance is continuing.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; finding of no continuing nuisance quashed; matter remitted to county court for determination of remedy.
Orders
- Respondent to serve and file evidence and statement of case as to remedy within 28 days.
- Appellants to serve and file evidence and statement of case in reply within two weeks thereafter.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment