Partakis-Stevens & Anor v Sihan & Ors (Re Consequential Matters) [2023] EWHC 1051 (TCC) (05 May 2023)
The Stevens, as successful claimants in nuisance, are entitled to 75% of their costs against the Sihans and 50% against the Romeros, reflecting partial lack of success and unreasonable conduct. The Romeros are entitled to indemnity from the Sihans for their liability to the Stevens and to 90% of their own costs against the Sihans, with costs assessed on the standard basis. Costs incurred by the Romeros in bringing the additional claim are not recoverable as damages but only as costs under s.51 SCA 1981. Interest is awarded at 3% p.a. on judgment and costs.
- Citation
- [2023] EWHC 1051 (TCC)
- Parties
- Claimant: Georgina Partakis-Stevens; Claimant: Laurence Stevens; First Defendant / Defendant to Additional Claim: Baljit Sihan; Second Defendant / Defendant to Additional Claim: Lesley Sihan; Third Defendant / Claimant in Additional Claim: Sergio Romero; Fourth Defendant / Claimant in Additional Claim: Eliana Guercio
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 May 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (technology and Construction Court) / Judgment on Consequential Matters Following Trial
- Outcome
- Costs orders made: Stevens recover 75% of costs against Sihans and 50% against Romeros; Romeros indemnified by Sihans for Stevens' costs and recover 90% of their own costs against Sihans; interest awarded.
- Legal Topics
- Nuisance, Misrepresentation, Breach of Contract, Costs, Damages, Civil Liability (contribution) Act 1978
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Georgina Partakis-Stevens
Claimant
Laurence Stevens
Claimant
Baljit Sihan
First Defendant / Defendant to Additional Claim
Lesley Sihan
Second Defendant / Defendant to Additional Claim
Sergio Romero
Third Defendant / Claimant in Additional Claim
Eliana Guercio
Fourth Defendant / Claimant in Additional Claim
Procedural Posture
Civil (technology and Construction Court) / Judgment on Consequential Matters Following Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate costs orders following findings of nuisance, misrepresentation, and breach of contract
- 2 Entitlement to damages and indemnities under the Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978
- 3 Assessment of costs as damages versus costs under CPR 44
Ratio Decidendi
The Stevens, as successful claimants in nuisance, are entitled to 75% of their costs against the Sihans and 50% against the Romeros, reflecting partial lack of success and unreasonable conduct. The Romeros are entitled to indemnity from the Sihans for their liability to the Stevens and to 90% of their own costs against the Sihans, with costs assessed on the standard basis. Costs incurred by the Romeros in bringing the additional claim are not recoverable as damages but only as costs under s.51 SCA 1981. Interest is awarded at 3% p.a. on judgment and costs.
Court Disposition
Costs orders made: Stevens recover 75% of costs against Sihans and 50% against Romeros; Romeros indemnified by Sihans for Stevens' costs and recover 90% of their own costs against Sihans; interest awarded.
Orders
- Stevens to recover 75% of their costs from Sihans and 50% from Romeros, not exceeding 75% in total.
- Stevens awarded interim payment on account of costs: £275,672.77 from Sihans, £183,781.85 from Romeros.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment