Universities Superannuation Scheme Ltd v Simpson & Ors [2004] EWHC 935 (Ch) (29 April 2004)
Normal pension age for the purposes of preserved benefits must be determined by reference to the individual member's contractual retirement age, not a scheme-wide age. The trustee may not apply an actuarial reduction to preserved benefits brought into payment at or after the member's contractual retirement age (not less than 60), where no such reduction would apply to long service benefits. The trustee's contrary practice is inconsistent with the rules and the legislation.
- Citation
- [2004] EWHC 935 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Universities Superannuation Scheme Limited; First Defendant: Keith Simpson; Second Defendant: Jane McAdoo; Third Defendant: University of London
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 29 April 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Chancery Division Civil Claim / First Instance Judgment
- Outcome
- Claimant's practice declared unlawful; directions on administration deferred.
- Legal Topics
- Occupational Pension Schemes, Preservation of Pension Benefits, Actuarial Reduction, Normal Pension Age, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Universities Superannuation Scheme Limited
Claimant
Keith Simpson
First Defendant
Jane McAdoo
Second Defendant
University of London
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Chancery Division Civil Claim / First Instance Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trustee of the Universities Superannuation Scheme may apply an actuarial reduction to preserved pension benefits brought into payment at a member's contractual retirement age below the scheme's normal retirement age
- 2 Whether 'normal pension age' under the Pension Schemes Act 1993 is determined by individual contractual retirement age or a scheme-wide age
Ratio Decidendi
Normal pension age for the purposes of preserved benefits must be determined by reference to the individual member's contractual retirement age, not a scheme-wide age. The trustee may not apply an actuarial reduction to preserved benefits brought into payment at or after the member's contractual retirement age (not less than 60), where no such reduction would apply to long service benefits. The trustee's contrary practice is inconsistent with the rules and the legislation.
Court Disposition
Claimant's practice declared unlawful; directions on administration deferred.
Orders
- Trustee may not apply actuarial reduction to preserved benefits brought into payment at or after a member's contractual retirement age (not less than 60) if no such reduction would apply to long service benefits.
- Calculation of cash equivalent transfer values must also reflect this ruling.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment