The PNPF Trust Company Ltd v Taylor & Ors [2010] EWHC 1573 (Ch) (28 June 2010)
The Trustee's power of amendment under the 1988 Rules is broad but not unlimited; it cannot be exercised to impose new or additional contribution obligations on Participating Bodies beyond those contemplated by the Deeds of Accession and the original scheme structure. The recent contribution rules (Rules 13(4) and 14(4)) are valid only to the extent they do not impose fundamentally new liabilities. Section 75 Pensions Act 1995 applies to the Scheme, and statutory employer debts can arise on cessation events, but only against entities that qualify as 'employers' under the statutory regime. The scheme specific funding regime under the Pensions Act 2004 applies, but does not override the...
- Citation
- [2010] EWHC 1573 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: THE PNPF TRUST COMPANY LTD (AS TRUSTEE OF THE PILOTS NATIONAL PENSION FUND); 1st Defendant: Geoff Taylor; 2nd Defendant: Terry Clark; 3rd Defendant: Milford Haven Port Authority; 4th Defendant: Port of London Authority; 5th Defendant: Shoreham Port Authority; 6th Defendant: Port of Tyne Authority; 7th Defendant: First Corporate Shipping Limited (trading as "THE BRISTOL PORT COMPANY"); 8th Defendant: PD Teesport Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 June 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Part 8 Claim (trustee's Application for Directions) / First Instance Judgment
- Outcome
- Declaratory judgment; guidance provided to Trustee on all issues raised in the claim form.
- Legal Topics
- Occupational Pension Schemes, Trustee Powers, Statutory Employer Debt, Scheme Amendment Powers, Section 75 Pensions Act 1995, Scheme Specific Funding (ssf) Regime, Deeds of Accession, Competent Harbour Authorities, Pilotage Act 1987
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
THE PNPF TRUST COMPANY LTD (AS TRUSTEE OF THE PILOTS NATIONAL PENSION FUND)
Claimant
Geoff Taylor
1st Defendant
Terry Clark
2nd Defendant
Milford Haven Port Authority
3rd Defendant
Port of London Authority
4th Defendant
Shoreham Port Authority
5th Defendant
Port of Tyne Authority
6th Defendant
First Corporate Shipping Limited (trading as "THE BRISTOL PORT COMPANY")
7th Defendant
PD Teesport Limited
8th Defendant
Procedural Posture
Part 8 Claim (trustee's Application for Directions) / First Instance Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Trustee can amend the Scheme rules to broaden contribution powers given the Deeds of Accession
- 2 Validity and construction of recent contribution rules (Rules 13(4) and 14(4))
- 3 Application of statutory employer debt regime (Section 75 Pensions Act 1995) to the Scheme
Ratio Decidendi
The Trustee's power of amendment under the 1988 Rules is broad but not unlimited; it cannot be exercised to impose new or additional contribution obligations on Participating Bodies beyond those contemplated by the Deeds of Accession and the original scheme structure. The recent contribution rules (Rules 13(4) and 14(4)) are valid only to the extent they do not impose fundamentally new liabilities. Section 75 Pensions Act 1995 applies to the Scheme, and statutory employer debts can arise on cessation events, but only against entities that qualify as 'employers' under the statutory regime. The scheme specific funding regime under the Pensions Act 2004 applies, but does not override the...
Court Disposition
Declaratory judgment; guidance provided to Trustee on all issues raised in the claim form.
Orders
- Trustee's power of amendment is broad but cannot be used to impose fundamentally new contribution obligations on Participating Bodies beyond those contemplated by the Deeds of Accession.
- Recent contribution rules (Rules 13(4) and 14(4)) are valid only within the limits of the original scheme structure.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment