Urenco UK Ltd.v Urenco UK Pension Trustee Company Ltd & Anor
The statutory protection under Part 4 Schedule 8 Energy Act 2004 requires that, for the Transferred Employees, the Scheme’s power of amendment cannot be exercised to reduce future service benefits below those provided by the CPS as at the transfer date, ignoring the CPS’s power of amendment. The SPA and Undertakings reinforce this protection. The proposed changes to increase contributions and reduce pension increases are not permissible.
- Parties
- Claimant: Urenco UK Limited; First Defendant: Urenco UK Pension Trustee Company Limited; Second Defendant: Francis Gregory Alleyne Mossop
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 31 May 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (part 8 Claim) / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed; declaration granted in favour of the Defendants.
- Legal Topics
- Occupational Pension Schemes, Statutory Pension Protection, Scheme Amendment Powers, Transfer of Undertakings, Employee Benefits, Interpretation of Energy Act 2004, Effect of Undertakings and Certificates
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Urenco UK Limited
Claimant
Urenco UK Pension Trustee Company Limited
First Defendant
Francis Gregory Alleyne Mossop
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil (part 8 Claim) / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Scheme’s power of amendment in relation to future service benefits of the Transferred Employees is constrained by Part 4 Schedule 8 Energy Act 2004, and if so, to what extent.
- 2 Whether the Scheme’s power of amendment is constrained by the Sale and Purchase Agreement (SPA) or the Undertaking.
Ratio Decidendi
The statutory protection under Part 4 Schedule 8 Energy Act 2004 requires that, for the Transferred Employees, the Scheme’s power of amendment cannot be exercised to reduce future service benefits below those provided by the CPS as at the transfer date, ignoring the CPS’s power of amendment. The SPA and Undertakings reinforce this protection. The proposed changes to increase contributions and reduce pension increases are not permissible.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed; declaration granted in favour of the Defendants.
Orders
- The power of amendment in the Scheme may not be exercised so as to vary detrimentally the future service benefits of the Transferred Employees.
- The proposed changes to increase contributions and reduce pension increases for the Transferred Employees are not permissible.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment