Beech v Speare [2001] EWCA Civ 1164 (15 June 2001)
The fence was not so dangerous or inconspicuous as to amount to a breach of the occupier's duty of care. The claimant was aware of the fence and failed to notice it due to momentary inattention. The defendant was not liable.
- Citation
- [2001] EWCA Civ 1164
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Susan Beech; Defendant/appellant: David Frederick Speare (Secretary for and on behalf of The Trustees of Devonshire Road Evangelical Church)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 June 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury Occupiers' Liability / Appeal From Trial Court Judgment on Liability
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; judgment for the defendant
- Legal Topics
- Occupiers' Liability, Negligence, Contributory Negligence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Susan Beech
Claimant/respondent
David Frederick Speare (Secretary for and on behalf of The Trustees of Devonshire Road Evangelical Church)
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury Occupiers' Liability / Appeal From Trial Court Judgment on Liability
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant was liable in negligence for the claimant's injuries caused by tripping over a chain link fence on the defendant's premises
- 2 Whether the fence constituted a dangerous hazard such that the occupier breached the duty of care
- 3 Whether the claimant was contributorily negligent
Ratio Decidendi
The fence was not so dangerous or inconspicuous as to amount to a breach of the occupier's duty of care. The claimant was aware of the fence and failed to notice it due to momentary inattention. The defendant was not liable.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; judgment for the defendant
Orders
- Order by the recorder set aside
- Judgment for the defendant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment